Your team isn't slow. Now you can prove it.
Delivery slows down while work sits waiting for review, QA, and release. DevStats shows exactly where, so you can fix the process instead of pushing your people, with numbers from your own repos that hold up with anyone who asks.
Illustrative example: your review runs on your real data.
DevStats offers enhanced engineering metrics that help you protect your teams instead of ranking them
Every team reports numbers. Engineering reports a story
Sales has pipeline, finance has the forecast, marketing has cost per lead, and engineering has a narrative about how hard the sprint was.
You know your team, who’s working hard, and where the friction is, but "trust me" only goes so far when R&D is one of the biggest lines in the budget.
And the story breaks at the first follow-up question
The question comes from the CEO, the board, sales, or product. Why is this taking so long? Are we on track? Is the AI spend paying off?
You pull Jira exports and GitHub data and rebuild the slide. The number on it is story points. Everyone in the room knows story points can't answer "how much" or "when", and they don't say a word about where the AI time went.
Why is the billing release slipping again? Isn't AI supposed to make us 10× faster?
The team is moving fast. Reviews and QA are backed up.
Backed up how much? And when does it ship?
Every unanswered question costs you twice
Engineering starts to look like the least accountable team in the company. The questions come more often and get sharper.
You push for visible speed to buy time. Your team feels the pressure and knows it's aimed at the wrong thing.
The real delay never gets fixed. The next release slips for the same reason the last one did.
You end up defending your team with nothing but your word.
You've tried the usual fixes
Story points
Easy to game. Nobody trusts them past the first question.
Spreadsheets
A night of exports and formulas, and stale by next week.
Enterprise platforms
Months of back-and-forth. You need answers this quarter.
Tools that rank engineers
One leaderboard, and your team stops trusting the numbers for good.
You've accepted that engineering can't be measured without the numbers turning on your team. That's the part that's wrong. Measure the process, and the numbers point at the process, not at people.
Your team isn't slow. The work is waiting
Coding takes hours. Shipping takes weeks. The gap sits between stages where PRs wait for review, reviews wait for merge, and merges wait for release. DevStats splits cycle time into stages and shows where the effort goes, so you can fix the process instead of asking people to code faster.
See cycle time broken into stages.
Point to the stage where work waits, then fix the handoff: review ownership, QA capacity, release cadence. That's a process change, not a performance review.
Engineering Investment.
See how much engineering time goes to new things, improvements, and keeping the lights on. When KTLO eats the roadmap, you can name it, size it, and change it before the next planning cycle.
A clear bar for every metric.
Benchmark bands show which numbers are a real problem and which are normal for a team your size, so you fix what matters first and leave the rest alone.
Review wait shows up as a stage, not a feeling. Rotate ownership, cap PR size, and watch the stage shrink.
QA and release waits are capacity and cadence problems. Benchmarks tell you which one is out of range for your size.
When keep-the-lights-on crowds out new things, Engineering Investment gives you the number to renegotiate the roadmap.
Every one of these is a process fix. None of them is “code faster.”
Numbers that protect your team
Most engineering metrics tools sell leaders visibility into their engineers. DevStats gives you evidence to defend them.
- ✓Team and flow views come first. You see how work moves through the process, and where the process breaks.
- ✓Individual views support 1:1 prep and help unblock someone who's stuck.
- ✓No leaderboards or vanity metrics. Get the full picture of what’s happening.
Is the latest frontier AI model actually making you faster?
Your team is paying for Copilot, Cursor, Claude Code, or whatever launched last month. Developer estimates can't tell you whether it worked. Delivery numbers can.
If the work is still waiting for review, a faster model just fills the queue sooner. DevStats tracks delivery metrics against the tools and models your team adopts, so you can see what changed after each switch, and what didn't because the process didn't.
One team went all-in on a new model. Their DevStats numbers showed delivery didn't move: review wait was the bottleneck, not coding. They fixed the review rotation, switched to a cheaper model, and shipped faster than before.
AI makes a good process faster. It can't fix a broken one.
Get set up in hours. No sprint required
Connect your git provider and issue tracker, invite a few teammates, and your first numbers appear within hours.
GitHub 
GitLab 
Bitbucket 
Azure DevOps 
Jira 
Linear PR, commit, and ticket metadata
- ✓Read-only access
- ✓We never see your source code
- ✓Team-level by design
SOC 2 Type II
SOC 2 Type II Encrypted in transit (TLS 1.3) and at rest (AES-256)."DevStats is one of these tools that you think you don't need, but it's just so easy to use and gives so many insightful details that you might be missing."
$27 per active contributor. No bait-and-switch pricing
On GitLab, Bitbucket, or Azure DevOps? LinearB charges $59 per user per month on Enterprise. DevStats is $27.
What engineering leaders ask before booking
No. If you connect first, the review runs on your own numbers. If you don't, we'll connect them together on the call.
DevStats leads with team and flow views, so the numbers point at the process. Individual views are for 1:1s and for unblocking someone who's stuck. There are no leaderboards or rankings.
[CONFIRM: plain-language answer on data access]. DevStats is SOC 2 Type II certified.
[CONFIRM: realistic time from signup to first numbers]
[CONFIRM: full list of git providers and issue trackers]
[CONFIRM: what AI and model tracking shows]
It’s $27 per active contributor per month. We don't bill developers who aren't active. No usage credits or request-a-quote steps.
14 days of the full Pro plan with no credit card.
It's a review of your numbers. You leave with your cycle-time breakdown, your benchmark read, and what to fix first.
See your own numbers in 30 minutes
Pick a 30-minute slot in the next few days.
We'll email three optional steps. Start the free trial, connect your tools, and invite a few teammates. Or do it together on the call.
Walk through your cycle time, your investment mix, and the first process fix to make.
You leave withYour cycle-time breakdown, a read on where you stand against teams your size, and the first process fix to make.
Book your Insights Review →Book now and your numbers are ready before the next ask, whether it comes from the CEO, the board, a planning cycle, or a budget review.